Ellul’s 76 Reasonable Questions to Ask About Any Technology

I envy anyone who has not read Jacques Ellul.  He is difficult, provocative, insightful and in my opinion a highly relevant philosopher.  His book, “The Technological Society” is a great starting place.  The post below is from an Ellul site.  

It is interesting to speculate how books fit into into his scheme.

 

76 Reasonable Questions

to ask about any technology

by Jacques Ellul

Ecological       

What are its effects on the health of the planet and of the person? 

Does it preserve or destroy biodiversity? 

Does it preserve or reduce ecosystem integrity? 

What are its effects on the land? 

What are its effects on wildlife? 

How much, and what kind of waste does it generate? 

Does it incorporate the principles of ecological design? 

Does it break the bond of renewal between humans and nature? 

Does it preserve or reduce cultural diversity? 

What is the totality of its effects, its “ecology”?   

 

Social

Does it serve community? 

Does it empower community members? 

How does it affect our perception of our needs? 

Is it consistent with the creation of a communal, human economy? 

What are its effects on relationships? 

Does it undermine conviviality? 

Does it undermine traditional forms of community? 

How does it affect our way of seeing and experiencing the world? 

Does it foster a diversity of forms of knowledge? 

Does it build on, or contribute to, the renewal of traditional forms of knowledge? 

Does it serve to commodity knowledge or relationships? 

To what extent does it redefine reality? 

Does it erase a sense of time and history? 

What is its potential to become addictive? 

Practical

What does it make? 

Who does it benefit? 

What is its purpose? 

Where was it produced? 

Where is it used? 

Where must it go when it’s broken or obsolete? 

How expensive is it? 

Can it be repaired? 

By an ordinary person? 

Moral

What values does its use foster? 

What is gained by its use? 

What are its effects beyond its utility to the individual? 

What is lost in using it? 

What are its effects on the least advantaged in society? 

Ethical

How complicated is it? 

What does it allow us to ignore? 

To what extent does it distance agent from effect? 

Can we assume personal, or communal responsibility for its effects? 

Can its effects be directly apprehended? 

What ancillary technologies does it require? 

What behavior might it make possible in the future? 

What other technologies might it make possible? 

Does it alter our sense of time and relationships in ways conducive to nihilism? 

Vocational

What is its impact on craft? 

Does it reduce, deaden, or enhance human creativity? 

Is it the least imposing technology available for the task? 

Does it replace, or does it aid human hands and human beings? 

Can it be responsive to organic circumstance? 

Does it depress or enhance the quality of goods? 

Does it depress or enhance the meaning of work? 

Metaphysical

What aspect of the inner self does it reflect? 

Does it express love? 

Does it express rage? 

What aspect of our past does it reflect? 

Does it reflect cyclical or linear thinking? 

Political

Does it concentrate or equalize power? 

Does it require, or institute a knowledge elite? 

It is totalitarian? 

Does it require a bureaucracy for its perpetuation? 

What legal empowerments does it require? 

Does it undermine traditional moral authority? 

Does it require military defense? 

Does it enhance, or serve military purposes? 

How does it affect warfare? 

Is it massifying? 

Is it consistent with the creation of a global economy? 

Does it empower transnational corporations? 

What kind of capital does it require? 

Aesthetic 

Is it ugly? 

Does it cause ugliness? 

What noise does it make? 

What pace does it set? 

How does it affect the quality of life (as distinct from the standard of living)?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dipteryx Panamensis

pipteryx-panamsis

 

A friend of mine gave me this piece of Dipteryx panamensis.  It is an incredibly dense wood– it measures 29 x 7 x 4 cm and weighs 881 grams. (11.25 x 2.75 x 1.5 inches, 1lb, 15 oz.), and can have a specific gravity up to 1.09.  I will most likely never get another example of this wood, I think it is now banned for export.

I considered making tool handles or something else out of this, then realized there was nothing I could do to improve– it is perfect the way it is.  Any shaping or transformation would only diminish it.

18th c. French Bookbinding With Jeff Peachey

(Please welcome guest blogger Liz Dube, Conservator for the University of Notre Dame Libraries.  She kindly agreed to write up some impressions from the workshop and share some images.  Jeff)

I ventured to New York City in April to take part in a rare and enlightening reenactment of 18th c. French bookbinding. During this four-day workshop organized by the New York Chapter of the Guild of Book Workers, our group of about a dozen bookbinders tucked ourselves away in the Conservation Lab of the New York Academy of Medicine and under the direction of Jeff Peachey, determined to bind books in the style of 18th c. France. 

The effort was informed by two contemporaneous bookbinding manuals: Traite de la Relieure des Livres (1762/63) by Jean-Vincent Capronnier Gauffecort and L’art du Relieur de Livres (1772) by Rene Martin Dudin. Jeff provided the group with packets that included organized copies of the manuals, along with some of his own notes. Samples of period bindings were inspected and discussed

artifacts
FIGURE ONE.  Examining the 18th c. artifacts

and Jeff characterized the bookbinding industry of the time. We learned that in 1776, 75% of the bookbinders in Paris were located on just one block within the University community. Bookbinders and printers at that time were associated with guilds that regulated the trade, so they were no doubt a tight-knit and highly regulated community. Jeff underscored that this pre-industrial era period was the end of the hand-bound book era, and how fortunate we are to have two manuals documenting how the work was performed in France at this time.

The manuals had to be taken in context, however. Dudin’s book was not written for contemporary or would-be bookbinders but rather for the book-buying public, to educate readers on the details of a properly bound book so they could avoid being cheated by an unscrupulous bookbinder. That said, Dudin’s wasn’t just a casual survey of “what to look for” in a bound book. Jeff notes in our course packet that Dudin devotes “12 (!) pages and 7 plates” to folding, and that, even if Dudin exaggerated, the extent of paper beating that occurred in this period appears to have been, according to current bookbinding sensibilities, rather extreme: 

“…judging from these descriptions…they were beating these books a lot; beating the sheets before folding, pressing after folding, beating after pressing, and pressing a second time … The boards are beaten before they are attached, and after covering. And as a final step, before returning the book to its owner, Dudin has us beat the four inside corners!” 

With this in mind, we folded the paper into sections and wielded hammers, proceeding to pound paper and raise such a racket that other workers in the serene house of research were drawn follow the noise to find its source, and to inquire whether we had any aspirin. We beat until we were sore and could no longer pick up a hammer.

beating

 

FIGURE TWO:  Beating.

more beaters

 

FIGURE THREE: More Beating.

 Alas, in the end, we concluded that our best efforts still would not have satisfied Dudin! 

But we were there to make books, not to pulverize paper, so we had to move on. Lovely 18th c. marbled paper made by Iris Nevins was employed for the endsheets. Kerfs were sawn into the spine and our textblocks were sewn on cords.

sewing

FIGURE FOUR:  Sewing on cords. 

Various sewing frames and a variety of sewing keys were experimented with, including Jeff’s small/collapsible travel sewing frame. While not mentioned in Dudin or Gauffecort, some even went for the ultimate simplicity of using nails as sewing keys, as documented in several later bookbinding manuals.

nail

 

FIGURE FIVE: Nail as a sewing key.

Pretty neat trick, that! Once the books were sewn, the cord laces were frayed and pasted, and the boards were prepared (again with the beating!) and laced on. Textblocks and board edges were then ploughed in-boards, using a prototype Peachey custom travel-sized plough.

ploughing

FIGURE SIX:  Jeff working up a sweat speed-ploughing.

Our super smooth textblock edges were then colored (red, of course), paneling (aka, adhering paper or parchment transverse spine linings) was performed, and endbands were sewn on.

enbanding

FIGURE SEVEN:  Sewing endbands

The time had finally arrived for covering our books. Vegetable-tanned calf skin prepared by Richard E. Meyer & Sons was on hand for the task. But first, we were treated to a mini Peachey workshop on knives, spokeshaves, and knife honing, the completion of which found my knife was sharper than it’s ever been! For resharpening a knife, Jeff recommends pressure sensitive adhesive backed 3M microfinishing film mounted on a very smooth surface such as glass or marble, or—even better—strips of aluminum, the surface which was first hand lapped smooth. Jeff’s set was super light and travel friendly and worked really well—just add water and hone.

honing

FIGURE EIGHT:  Knife honing station, complete with bacon band-aids

To maintain his sharp edges, Jeff uses a strop made of horsebutt laminated to calf skin, both flesh side out.  The first stroping is on the horsebutt, which contains a .5 micron green honing compound, followed by a final polish on the naked calf skin. Jeff then demoed paring and covering-in (particularly impressing the group with his trick of paring all four edges of the leather in one swoop of the knife).

covering

FIGURE NINE: Jeff demonstrating leather covering

We then followed suit and tied up our books to dry a bit. They were then finished off with speckling (we passed on the traditional chemicals, instead opting for Golden Fluid Acrylics) followed by a couple of blind lines on the boards and spine. At the end of the four-day session, our group was very satisfied with the results of our labor! Thanks Jeff!

(Thanks back at you, Liz!)

There is another review of this workshop by Brenna Campbell on the NY Chapter of the Guild of Bookworkers website.